For many individuals living in group settings following a catastrophic injury, the preference for greater independence is understandable. Apartment-style living offers privacy, autonomy, and a sense of normalcy that congregate group homes cannot always provide. Under Michigan’s No-Fault system, however, a transition from group residential care to an apartment setting is rarely a matter of resident preference alone, particularly when the plan of care includes the addition of Attendant Care services billed under S5125.
Because apartment-style placement paired with attendant care frequently increases the overall cost of care compared to a group home rate, insurers scrutinize these transitions closely. A request for transition must be supported by clinical justification demonstrating that continued group living is no longer clinically advisable, not simply less preferred. Common justifications include documented behavioral escalation incompatible with a shared-living environment, substance-seeking behavior placing the resident or housemates at risk, recurrent infection control concerns, or a clinical need for a lower-stimulation, individualized environment that a congregate setting cannot safely accommodate.
This justification cannot rest on case management narrative alone. When the Treatment Plan is updated to reflect a transition, physician language must directly address the clinical rationale: a diagnosis-linked explanation of why group placement is contraindicated, the specific risks mitigated by an apartment setting, and how the added attendant care hours are medically necessary to safely support the individual outside a supervised group environment.
Vague statements of resident preference or quality of life are insufficient and are routinely challenged under reasonable and necessary review standards.
A well-documented transition, grounded in physician-supported medical necessity, protects both the resident’s right to appropriate, least-restrictive care and the provider’s ability to defend the cost differential under MCL 500.3107(1)(a).
Another Blog Post by Direct Care Training & Resource Center, Inc. Photos used are designed to complement the written content. They do not imply a relationship with or endorsement by any individual nor entity and may belong to their respective copyright holders.
| Follow us in the Social Stratosphere… | ||||
|
